Circular 1/12: AGM OF THE JOHORE BAR FOR 2012/13

I am pleased to inform you that the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Johore Bar proceeded smoothly on Friday 24th February 2011 at the Jotic Auditorium in Johor Bahru with an attendance of 104 members.


The following persons were elected to the Johore Bar Committee for the year 2012/13 :

Chairman : Mr S. Gunasegaran

Committee Members :

Mr Andrew Wong Fook Hin

Mr Tho Kam Chew

Puan Shahareen Begum Binti Abdul Subhan

Puan Norhayati Binti Mohamed

Ms. Mary Jesmal Periera

Ms. Sujata L a/p M P Lakshmanan

Mr Kuna Nadasen

Mr R. Jayabalan

Ms. Yvonne Young Ai Peng

Puan Mazni Binti Mohamad Ikhwan

Johore Bar Representative : Mr K. Mohan


The members resolved that the Annual Subscription to the Johore Bar should remain at RM 200.00


The Meeting passed 3 Motions, particulars whereof are as follows :

Motion No. 1 (Proposed by the Johore Bar Committee)

(1) That the Johore Bar Committee be and is hereby empowered to levy a one-time additional subscription of RM250.00 from its members for the year 2012/13 to meet the cost and expense of renovating the property to be acquired for the use of the Johore Bar and the Johore Legal Aid Centre; and

(2) That such additional subscription shall be payable by each advocate and solicitor by 30th June 2012.

Motion No. 2 (Proposed by Mr. R. Jayabalan)

(1) That the courts should cease from directing or expecting the lawyers, in the absence of clear legislative provisions, to type, prepare and supply the Notes of Evidence;

(2) the Notes of Evidence should be prepared by the courts and supplied to the parties based on the audio visual recording when there is an appeal or application from the parties;

(3) the Judiciary should consider studying the practice in other jurisdictions such as in Singapore where the task of preparing the notes of evidence is fully technologised and outsourced with direct supervision by the courts and without burdening the judge and the lawyers and also in Sabah and Sarawak where the transcript of court proceedings under the CRT is done by the court stenographers;

(4) the Judiciary should engage a sufficient number of typists or stenographers to facilitate the process of transcribing the Notes of Evidence;

(5) the Bar Council to seriously pursue this issue with the Judiciary including bringing to the Judiciary’s attention of the difficulties faced by lawyers and to forward proposals including the systems used in other jurisdictions on transcribing court proceedings.

Motion No. 3 (Proposed by Mr. Mathews George)

(1) That the mediation process is only resorted to with the express consent of the litigants.

(2) That mediation should be conducted only at the initial stage of the proceedings, unless agreed to otherwise by the litigants.

(3) That Judicial Officers conducting mediation refrain from passing judgment on the strength or weakness of the case.

(4) That mediation should not be pursued at the expense of litigants’ rights and interest and lawyer’s professionalism.

(5) That the Courts adhere to the Chief Registrar’s Practice Direction No. 5 of 2010 in dealing with Mediation.

(6) That the above resolutions be sent by the Johor Bar Committee to the Chief Justice of Malaysia, President of the Court Of Appeal, Senior Judge High Court Johor Bahru and to the Bar Council.

Please be guided accordingly.



Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In
New User Registration
*Required field